<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Off Limits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanbrown.me/off-limits/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanbrown.me/off-limits</link>
	<description>Code. Culture. Crap.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:09:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bert</title>
		<link>http://jonathanbrown.me/off-limits/comment-page-1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I would have to agree with you Jon. There should be something that keeps a protection on retooling what is considered &quot;great art.&quot; However, who defines &quot;great art&quot; and what criteria determines that? I think that there is too much subjectivity involved, but in this particular case I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree with you Jon. There should be something that keeps a protection on retooling what is considered &#8220;great art.&#8221; However, who defines &#8220;great art&#8221; and what criteria determines that? I think that there is too much subjectivity involved, but in this particular case I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
